🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters praising your advice on growing your business? Are headhunters reaching out to explore opportunities?

If not, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of female professionals joined an organized LinkedIn experiment this week following popular discussions indicated that switching their profile gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" terminology - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system prioritizes men who employ online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which posts appear to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how content perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", described remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after observing her audience decrease substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with comparable "assertive" style

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my content were softer - brief and insightful, but also warm and human," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, saying "Every day I continued, and results got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some testers encountered positive results. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to unofficial tests where the same posts by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and spread posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."